You know how it goes. You're scrolling through your news feed and everything feels... slanted. Like you're only getting half the story. I remember feeling that way back in 2018 when major outlets ignored some local election stories that mattered to my community. That's when I started seriously hunting for conservative perspectives online. Took me ages to sort the wheat from the chaff.
Look, if you're searching for top conservative websites, you probably want more than just a dry list. You need to know where to find real substance without the fluff. Which sites actually break news versus just rehashing talking points? Who's got the inside track on policy debates? Where can you comment without getting mobbed? That's what we'll dig into here.
Cutting Through the Noise: How We Picked These Platforms
Before we jump in, full disclosure: I've personally subscribed to or regularly visited every site on this list for at least six months. Some I've followed for years. When compiling these top conservative websites, here's what actually mattered:
- Original reporting (not just aggregating wire stories)
- Policy depth beyond surface-level outrage
- Reader communities that don't feel like echo chambers
- Consistency in publishing quality content
- Transparency about funding and editorial stance
Funny thing - when I first started tracking these sites, I assumed the flashiest ones would be most substantial. Boy was I wrong. Daily Wire looked slick but felt shallow until they hired actual beat reporters in 2019. Meanwhile, National Review's clunky design hid some of the sharpest analysis out there.
The Definitive Conservative Digital Landscape
Below you'll find the complete breakdown of what I consider the current top 10 conservative websites based on hundreds of hours of reading, comparing, and frankly, getting annoyed at some of their quirks. Each entry includes subscription costs where applicable - because nobody likes surprise paywalls.
The Daily Wire
Ben Shapiro's brainchild has evolved into a multimedia beast. Their investigative team broke the Loudoun County school scandal stories that went mainstream months later. What I appreciate: They timestamp corrections prominently. What grinds my gears: Their mobile app crashes constantly (tried it on three different phones last month).
Content focus: Culture wars, education policies, Hollywood analysis
Subscription: $14.99/month or $129/year (includes documentaries)
Daily must-read: "Morning Wire" newsletter
Subscription: $14.99/month or $129/year (includes documentaries)
Daily must-read: "Morning Wire" newsletter
National Review
The granddaddy of conservative thought. I've disagreed with their foreign policy stance for years, but their Congressional source network is unmatched. Budget hawk types will love their "Numbers Column" dissecting spending bills line by line. Print magazine subscribers ($59/year) get early access to long-form pieces.
The Federalist
Where policy nerds and snark collide. Senior editor Mollie Hemingway's election coverage remains essential reading, though their comment section gets radioactive fast. Free access but they push $5/month voluntary subscriptions hard. Best feature: Their SCOTUS breakdowns explain legal jargon in plain English.
Washington Examiner
Their White House team has sources closer than most. Broke multiple staffing shakeup stories during the transition years. What I love: Their "Beltway Confidential" newsletter. What's frustrating: Important local reporting gets buried under national politics. Digital subscription: $99/year with student discounts available.
Breitbart News
Let's be real - their immigration reporting drives the conversation but sometimes cherry-picks data. I use them as a pulse-check on populist sentiment rather than policy deep dives. No paywall makes them accessible, though ad density borders on obnoxious. Not for the thin-skinned.
Washington Times
Their national security team produces gold. Remember that 2021 Pentagon leak analysis everyone cited? That started here. Subscription runs $9.99/month but they offer 10 free articles monthly. Old-school newspaper layout takes getting used to - feels like browsing a 2005 website sometimes.
Fox News Digital
Yes, obvious inclusion. But their election night data team puts cable competitors to shame. Desktop experience beats mobile by miles. Real value: Their state politics verticals (like Fox 26 Houston) cover stories national desks ignore. Free access supported by heavy video ads.
Townhall
Best for: Quick takes from diverse voices. Columnist Katie Pavlich's energy coverage actually explains permitting reform without putting you to sleep. Downsides: Aggressive pop-up ads and too much recycled content. Use an ad blocker unless you enjoy surprise autoplay videos.
The Blaze
Glenn Beck's empire offers surprisingly nuanced historical documentaries through their $10/month subscription. Their live events coverage shines (CPAC, rallies etc.), though their op-ed section feels like an echo chamber. Mobile app UX beats Daily Wire's by miles.
American Conservative
The anti-establishment counterpoint. Rod Dreher's "Live Not By Lies" series changed how I view cultural resistance. Small but mighty team punches above its weight on foreign policy critiques. Donation-supported model (suggested $60/year) keeps them ad-light. Comment section actually fosters debate.
Comparing the Top Conservative News Platforms
| Website | Best For | Subscription Cost | Original Reporting Depth | Reader Community |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Daily Wire | Culture war deep dives | $14.99/month | ★★★☆☆ | Moderate engagement |
| National Review | Policy detail | $89/year | ★★★★☆ | High engagement |
| The Federalist | Legal analysis | Free (donation-based) | ★★☆☆☆ | High engagement |
| Washington Examiner | Inside DC reporting | $99/year | ★★★★★ | Low engagement |
| Breitbart | Populist pulse | Free | ★★★☆☆ | High engagement |
(Rating scale: 1 star = mostly aggregated content, 5 stars = investigative team with documented scoops)
Beyond the Big Names: Niche Platforms Worth Your Time
Sometimes the most valuable insights come from specialized outfits. Here's where I go when I need deep dives:
- Washington Free Beacon for FOIA-based investigations (that IRS targeting story? They broke it)
- Heat Street for tech/culture collisions (free but irregular updates)
- PJ Media for veteran affairs coverage (their VA hospital investigations are brutal)
- The Dispatch for Never-Trump conservative analysis ($10/month, premium podcasts included)
A word about podcasts - nearly all these top conservative websites now produce audio content. National Review's "The Editors" gives you policy debates you won't hear elsewhere. Daily Wire's back catalog is worth the subscription alone if you commute.
Red Flags I've Learned to Spot
After getting burned a few times, here's how I vet new conservative sites:
Warning signs:
• No masthead listing editors/owners
• Zero corrections policy visible
• All content published within last 6 months (likely rebranded zombie site)
• Crypto payment options only (seriously, saw this last month)
• No masthead listing editors/owners
• Zero corrections policy visible
• All content published within last 6 months (likely rebranded zombie site)
• Crypto payment options only (seriously, saw this last month)
Real talk: Some newer entrants like "The Post Millennial" showed promise but got too reliant on sensational headlines. I dropped them from my rotation when factual errors piled up last election cycle.
Your Conservative Media Questions Answered
Let's tackle common questions folks have about these top conservative websites based on reader emails I've gotten:
Do any offer student discounts?
Washington Examiner does 50% off for .edu addresses. National Review offers $29 student print subscriptions. Most others don't advertise discounts but will negotiate if you email support - saved $30 on Blaze subscription this way.
Which sites break actual news vs. commentary?
From my tracking: Examiner, Daily Wire, and Washington Times regularly break stories picked up by AP/Reuters. Breitbart occasionally but often trails. Commentary dominates at Federalist/Townhall. Cross-reference exclusive claims with official documents - learned that the hard way.
How biased are these compared to mainstream outlets?
They're openly ideological - transparency matters. What surprised me: Their fact-checking on financial/regulation stories often beats mainstream business desks. But cultural coverage? Assume heavy framing. I balance with center-right sources like The Dispatch.
Any completely free quality options?
Townhall and Breitbart offer full free access (ad-supported). The Federalist doesn't technically require payment but nags constantly. For true no-cost depth, bookmark CSPAN video archives alongside these sites.
Building Your Personal Media Mix
Here's what worked for me after trial and error:
| Purpose | Recommended Sources | Time Commitment |
|---|---|---|
| Daily headlines | Washington Times + Daily Wire newsletter | 15 minutes |
| Policy understanding | National Review deep dives + Examiner analysis | 45 minutes/week |
| Cultural commentary | The Federalist + American Conservative | 30 minutes/week |
| Fact-checking | Ballotpedia + official state legislature sites | Variable |
Don't make my early mistake: Subscribing to everything leads to inbox overload. Start with two free sources and one paid. Add specialty outlets only for issues you actively work on (school board, local GOP committee etc.).
Final thought: These websites aren't perfect. I've fired off angry emails to editors at three on this list. But they fill crucial gaps in today's media landscape. What matters is engaging critically - even with sources you generally trust. That's how we stay sharp.
Leave a Message